-
A Great Big Number
May 7, 2019
Have an opinion? Add your comment below. Spotify is also trumpeting their investment in podcasting, but not even the most optimistic analyst thinks podcasting is a source of huge profits any time soon. In fact, as I reported recently, while podcasting is the darling of the moment, the backlash has already begun, and almost every podcast will end up negligible, just as most blogs are today. And everyone was so excited about blogging when it was in its infancy. It was going to make every blogger rich. Remember?
-
How does 100,000,000 sound?
It was announced with great fanfare.
PR releases sent to every media source worldwide, trumpeting the great, huge number: SPOTIFY NOW HAS 100 MILLION PAYING SUBSCRIBERS.
The only problem with banging the drum so hard about subscribers is that it magnifies Spotify's obvious problem: It can't make money. (And artists hate it because they can't make money from the Spotify streaming model, either.)
In fact, it lost $158 million in the most recently reported quarterly earnings, which are always presented in the most positive, glowing terms possible.
After all, while the company is burning through cash, the executives and founders of the company are still getting paid millions.
That's how these things work. Google, Clear Channel and Cumulus, if you have a short memory.
Spotify is also trumpeting their investment in podcasting, but not even the most optimistic analyst thinks podcasting is a source of huge profits any time soon. In fact, as I reported recently, while podcasting is the darling of the moment, the backlash has already begun, and almost every podcast will end up negligible, just as most blogs are today.
And everyone was so excited about blogging when it was in its infancy. It was going to make every blogger rich. Remember?
Spotify and Pandora and Apple Music are also beginning to understand that listeners, at least a lot of listeners, want companionship along with their music. A human touch now and then. Something radio used to do better than any other medium.
So the truth is, the only way music streaming can make really big bucks, like radio big bucks, is if radio helps it by making "free" music listening frustrating enough to be impossible.
And we're still doing our best at that.
If radio, as an industry, would cut back advertising to six or even eight units an hour, get rid of all the irritating sponsorships and remotes and garbage that passes as "entertainment" or "community involvement," and offer listeners a way to personalize their music, build playlists of their own, that they could listen to on a radio station's website, Spotify and Pandora would probably disappear.
Radio created Spotify. Radio fuels its subscriber growth.
Radio's great, big number is profit. Cash flow. Margins.
And those great big numbers are created by our other great big numbers: commercial minutes per hour, commercial units per hour, value-added garbage promotions, executive compensation, and debt service.
We created Spotify and we can make them irrelevant pretty quickly if we're just willing to forego our huge 30%+ margins for a few years.
The way Amazon did for so many years, actually losing money in order to build market share.
I wonder if Sears and JC Penney's would change how they responded to what seemed a tiny threat a couple of decades ago.
Oh, right, they're out of business now basically. Sorry about that.
What? You think our demise is as inevitable as retail shopping's seems to be?
Not so fast, Pilgrim. Look no further than the company that doesn't sell one thing online and is beating Amazon -- that would be Ollie's Bargain Outlet.
-
-